Panikkaran 2025 Boomex Www.moviespapa.parts Sho... Instant
Need to confirm if there's any real movie called "Panikkaran 2025". A quick search shows no such film in production or released. So it's definitely fake. The combination of elements here (fake title, suspicious domain, possible phishing) points to an attempt to scam users.
Then there's "BoomEX" – not sure what that stands for. Could be an event name, a marketing campaign, or maybe a typo. The website "www.moviespapa.parts" looks like a URL fragment. "Moviespapa" might be a site related to movies, but "parts" is probably a typo or a subdomain. The trailing "Sho..." is incomplete, so maybe it's part of a longer domain or a typo for "show" or "shop". Panikkaran 2025 BoomEX www.moviespapa.parts Sho...
The user might be trying to warn others or seek information about this. But since it's likely a scam, I need to inform them not to engage with such sites. Also, advise them to report it and avoid sharing personal info. Make sure to mention official sources for movie info. Need to confirm if there's any real movie
Putting this together, the user might have stumbled upon a phishing site or a fake movie teaser. Movie titles being pushed to fake domains often indicate scams. The URL fragment doesn't lead to a legitimate site; I should check if "moviespapa.parts" is a real domain. A quick Google search shows it's not a recognized movie database or official site. The ".parts" domain is usually for auto parts or suppliers, so using it for a movie site is a red flag. The combination of elements here (fake title, suspicious
I should structure my response to clarify that this is a potential scam, explain why the URL is suspicious, and give safety tips. Keep the tone cautious but not alarmist. Make sure the user knows to verify through official channels and avoid interacting with the link.
Hello Thom
Serenity System and later Mensys owned eComStation and had an OEM agreement with IBM.
Arca Noae has the ownership of ArcaOS and signed a different OEM agreement with IBM. Both products (ArcaOS and eComStation) are not related in terms of legal relationship with IBM as far as I know.
For what it had been talked informally at events like Warpstock, neither Mensys or Arca Noae had access to OS/2 source code from IBM. They had access to the normal IBM products of that time that provided some source code for drivers like the IBM Device Driver Kit.
The agreements with IBM are confidential between the companies, but what Arca Noae had told us, is that they have permission from IBM to change the binaries of some OS/2 components, like the kernel, in case of being needed. The level of detail or any exceptions to this are unknown to the public because of the private agreements.
But there is also not rule against fully replacing official IBM binaries of the OS with custom made alternatives, there was not a limitation on the OS/2 days and it was not a limitation with eComStation on it’s days.
Regards
4gb max ram WITH PAE! nah sorry a few frames would that ra mu like crazy. i am better off using 64x_hauku, linux or BSD.
> a few frames would that ra mu like crazy
I am not sure what you were trying to say. I can’t untangle that.
This is a 32-bit OS that aside from a few of its own 32-bit binaries mainly runs 16-bit DOS and Win16 ones.
There are a few Linux ports, but they are mostly CLI tools (e.g. `yum`). They don’t need much RAM either.
4GB is a lot. I reviewed ArcaOS and lack of RAM was not a problem.
Saying that, I’d love in-kernel PAE support for lots of apps with 2GB each. That would probably do everything I ever needed.